'The freedom of a society to place limitations on what may be said/done by individuals' is NOT a 'freedom' at all, it's by definition the opposite of freedom (in an Orwellian Newspeak way, actually, like 'war is peace, weakness is strength' and so on).

That your brain (or my brain) can't always comprehend objective reality doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Thinking like that is a slippery slope towards postmodernism.

And no, I do not support anarchy, in fact I am resolutely opposed to it. Modern anarchism is a far-left anti-liberal concept (see e.g. the recent CHAZ in Seattle) and I have absolutely no sympathy for that. I also don't support a Randian view of society, I wouldn't support UBI and social programs if I did. I don't know where you got that from.